![]() There are various players on the course now. I have a lot of baggage with this product because of problems I have with the customers, the implementation, the configuration, the settings - it is very, very troublesome. It is an important feature in these products and to the clients. The company fails to say we can not go back. But it is a fact that, in production, we can not effectively roll back the ransomwares and encrypted files after this kind of attack. We are supposed to be able to roll back the encrypted files. But these are still not the biggest problems for people using the product.Īn additional feature I would like to see is a randsomeware roll back for 72 hours and for 100 GB of files. It is supposed to be a feature in the EDR to defend against randsomeware. There are other particular pain points with the current solution which have to do with the reporting and the problems with difficulty of installation. The most obvious problem is that basically the product comes up with a lot of false positives. But the company is not making the broader changes they need to in the product to make it an effective solution. I have specific things, technical details for each feature and each use case that I have worked on. I want to benefit a lot of people, a lot of clients and a lot of users. I want to help secure the environments of the clients I work for. He would not just say "You are right." But even though he knows that there are issues, there have been no changes in the results and improvements with the product even up until now. We work with the Malwarebytes company a lot and have discussed the existing problems with the manager of Research and Development. I know of more than ten critical cases with clients which affect their use of the product adversely. You have to manually go there and do it." It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. That is something that you still have to do manually. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. ![]() "The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time.I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet." If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON PASSWORDI did a couple of tests with a password cracker. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |